Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
21. A time to revisit combat - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Its not that i cant "defence my position", its that its not worth the time. The above suggestions break the game in almost every possible way and they operate on a base assumption on the workings of the game that are wrong. Your v...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.10.13 00:52:00
|
22. A time to revisit combat - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: So, I can aim as finely with a sniper rifle and with a huge navy artillery gun? Wow, I didn't know! Actually yes, you can. The difference is of course, the sniper rifle has less area of effect, and thus has a far greater chance of...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.10.13 00:44:00
|
23. A time to revisit combat - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: First, there is no minimal range. There is an effective minimal range for moving targets, but you can be right beside someone else, neither of you moving, and still hit. That's what tracking represents, how quickly the turrets can tur...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.10.13 00:37:00
|
24. A time to revisit combat - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Manual Targeting: Again a real world ability that somehow is missing in EVE. Big whopping gun, yet for some odd reason I am unable to fire it.... simply because my target system is Jammed? Ok fine I get that my target system is jammed. So I can...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.10.12 13:22:00
|
25. A time to revisit combat - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I see a great many things proposed, some of which include ways to target sub systems, ways to enhance and improve ships, Tech II battleships of various flavor, all of which and many more sound really nice.... but I can not help but think its time ...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.10.12 13:21:00
|
26. Motherships in empire --- Why? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I am not sure what all the fuss is about, it was stated long, long ago that Capital ships can travel to .4 systems and below. A super Cap such as an MS is just a capital ship. Sure its got more armor, and sheilds and hull, but they cna be locked d...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.09.10 12:34:00
|
27. Client Closes to Desktop - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Same thing just started up here.... its getting really annoying, cause I can;t even log in long enough to do anything, the moment I do It drops back to teh desktop now. Quote: I am the Alpha and the Omega, what is it you wish to start or fin...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.09.01 09:39:00
|
28. POS Spreadsheets? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I am working on a new release of mine, but its gonna be a few more days at least. Quote: I am the Alpha and the Omega, what is it you wish to start or finish with me today?
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.07.02 07:26:00
|
29. Dangerous Looking Pixel EXPLOSION BIG PROBLEM - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Now before I begin I am not in anyway blaming EVE for the mishaps that have occured. However there seems to have been a rash of users effected, this is the 3rd post I have come across in mear moments. It may well be the new lines of code used to ...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.06.20 03:52:00
|
30. Self Powered Sentry guns. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I believe CCP has some future concept in the works for permanent gate guns, and station guns. There at the very least has been mention and talk of it for the last several months.... This is more ment as a temporary security measure in a temporary...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.06.03 01:42:00
|
31. Self Powered Sentry guns. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Like all things in EVE, for every peaceful use, there also has to be a way for pirates/enemies/hostiles to use them as well. As much as I would love to lean heavily on my carebear ways, it is truely only fair if its useable for all concepts of EVE...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.29 16:45:00
|
32. Self Powered Sentry guns. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Concept: Self Powered Sentry Guns, for use by all players. General data: An anchorable structure for system .6 and below systems. May be placed near POSes, Outposts, stargates, in asteroid belts, at moons, planets, open space, ect, ect, ect. Self...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.29 05:41:00
|
33. Total POS Manager (Spreadsheet) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Chraist Edited by: Chraist on 28/05/2007 10:44:49 Nice to see that my work is still alive :) I have made a new version of the sheet with some reactions included, but not the mining setup part. Please contact me if you w...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.28 22:45:00
|
34. Total POS Manager (Spreadsheet) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
For those of you having issues reading the Open Office file.... I have just found out that certain computers are reading it as a zip file. Its not a zipped or compressed file. Its however being read as such by some systems for an unknown reason. ...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.28 01:49:00
|
35. Invention questions I need answers to - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Arthmandar: For the record, my breif but equally useless career in the feild of invention did much worse then yours did. Frankly I believe CCP hyped the invention thing alot way too early, and many did the same or similar thing you have done. In...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.24 10:20:00
|
36. Moon mining in 0.7? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I think offically a Dev or moderator will have to answer this.... BUT!!!! So far as I and probably all of the EVE players know, you can not mine on a moon above .3 or .4.... Quote: I am the Alpha and the Omega, what is it you wish to start ...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.24 09:55:00
|
37. Total POS Manager (Spreadsheet) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Alaris Nightshadow In the Excel version, Cells E75 and F75 need adjustment, they don't include the Corp hangar array section Should be E75 = E3-SUM(E17:E73) F75 = F3-SUM(F17:F73) I'll fix that in the next revision. The...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.23 22:41:00
|
38. POS in reinforced question - in Science and Industry [original thread]
The Corp Hanger no. Fit ships at the maintance array yes. Reason: Corp hanger needs CPU, and anything with CPU shuts down the the POS is in reinforced mode. The Maintance Array does not need CPU as such it remains operational. Quote: I am ...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.23 08:36:00
|
39. Total POS Manager (Spreadsheet) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: zacuis Edited by: zacuis on 22/05/2007 22:22:00 exellent thx very much for doing this great sheet nice to be able to use it again 2 things tho i show error 503 in the kinetic resist box and the resists dont change when...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.23 04:02:00
|
40. Total POS Manager (Spreadsheet) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Added Excel Version for those wishing to use an excel spreadsheet. The Excel version does not include the Datasheet, or the tutorial documentation. Hope you all like it. Quote: I am the Alpha and the Omega, what is it you wish to start or ...
- by Admiral S3 - at 2007.05.22 21:16:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |